Media one hundred Vs Last Minimize Professional

I have used Media one hundred given that model 1 (early nineteen nineties) and although it was very shaky in those groundbreaking times I have usually cherished its distinct and straightforward function movement – and its image good quality. Despite the fact that it was less expensive than Avid in these early times its photo good quality was correct “on line’ quality. Considering that then I have upgraded every single number of a long time and seen the stability boost and additional characteristics extra.

Nevertheless most movie editors seem to be to use Closing Reduce Pro and I have arrive underneath growing pressure from colleagues to go throughout to it. As it occurred I presently had it on the shelf as a handful of many years back Apple stopped marketing DVD Studio Pro as a stand by itself plan. final cut pro x plugins so I had to buy the bundle which happened to incorporate FCP.

Effectively, I managed to resist producing the leap until not too long ago, when I commenced employing the new breed of tape-considerably less cameras. My initial knowledge was the considerably acclaimed Sony EX3, which was utilised for a movie for the charity ARCOS. The only way I could get its documents into M100 was by upgrading to the newest variation of FCP and then utilizing Sony’s Clip Browser and Clip Transfer computer software. That worked fantastic but then, for a new documentary production, I had footage from the Canon XF103, one more extremely popular digital camera. This time the only way I could get the material into M100 was to import it all into FCP initial and then export it out once more – a total squander of time. I contacted M100 assistance and they suggested some 3rd party computer software which was not only really costly but also necessary some tortuous navigation to track down each and every shot inside a multitude of folders. By this time I was fully cheesed off with Media one hundred and determined to give FCP a consider.

It was obviously a steep studying curve but with the assist files I was ready to get the dangle of it very swiftly. Some of the functions of FCP are greater than M100, its color grading for illustration, but I shortly located I had shuddered to a halt and the assist documents were no support. Importing information from the Flash card is quick and easy – all your shots are there ready to edit. But they all have two audio tracks, even the mute pictures. Okay, no problem, in M100 you just pick the clip and change off the tracks you never need ahead of dragging it to the timeline. Easy! But in FCP (I found by Googling the problem) you have to make a duplicate of a clip ahead of you can take away its sound tracks and then only by placing it in a “sequence” or timeline very first and then dragging it again to the bin. It performs but it is fiddly.

Audio mixing is a little bit fussy way too. Correct, FCP presents you finer manage but you have to click on on the clip 1st then alter the ranges in the editor. Media a hundred deals with it all in the timeline and is completely intuitive – and quick! With Media one hundred I normally edit in the timeline and I uncover it very surefooted and rapid. You have a very clear picture of what you’ve doing with all the tracks at a look – not so with FCP.

But the most frustrating element of employing FCP for me arrived when I put all my sequences with each other in 1 learn system. Clips that had performed properly in the quick sequence now announced that they “Want RENDERING”. Fair ample I simply click Render All. Absolutely nothing. So I finally get them to render by demo and mistake. But why? Just as effectively the customer was not sitting, tapping his fingers ready to see the 1st minimize. I am positive many of the difficulties I had were simply because I am a amateur with FCP but returning to Media a hundred later on was pure joy!


Leave a Reply